RED PRED
13th October 2007, 05:45 PM
Right, my views on these items ;
Where there is a danger to life and property then fine, lets have them, ie, near schools, around housing estates, places where the road is a hazard, where there is a high number of pedestrians or animals etc .
Where there is no hazard to the above then no, I think we should have a legal right to vandalise the revenue raising cameras, who is to say that a car doing 90mph on the motorway and driving with full attention is more dangerous than one doing 69mph and the driver on the phone ?
Just my thoughts on the subject .
Where there is a danger to life and property then fine, lets have them, ie, near schools, around housing estates, places where the road is a hazard, where there is a high number of pedestrians or animals etc .
Where there is no hazard to the above then no, I think we should have a legal right to vandalise the revenue raising cameras, who is to say that a car doing 90mph on the motorway and driving with full attention is more dangerous than one doing 69mph and the driver on the phone ?
Just my thoughts on the subject .